Do you imagine artists working alone, in a basement somewhere, detached from society? Do you imagine them being poor, bad with money, unable to function well in the everyday world of work?
This image is mostly false. Artists are embedded in the world, just like the rest of us, according to a recent article by Katy Waldman in the New York Times. She points out that this idea of a lone genius artist is “a recent phenomenon, a product of our fetishization of genius.” We like to think that our artists are geniuses, and that if they spend too much time in the real world, “their talent can start to feel corruptible.”
But most painters live in the world and work in the world. Even the most famous painters that we know from the past, almost all “had to hustle at one point.” For most artists, “The act of producing art can be anything but romantic.” It’s hard work, and artists need to get away and take a break from it, just like everyone else needs a vacation every now and then.
Our idea that artists live apart from the world “supposes that aesthetic experience is categorically different from everyday experience, and that muse-fueled invention floats apart from earthier forms of productivity.” But this isn’t what artists themselves would say. Every artist that I know emphasizes how much hard work it is, how much of it isn’t romantic, and doesn’t have much to do with romantic ideas like inspiration or genius.
Katy Waldman, “Working, artist.” March 22, 2018. The New York Times Sunday style magazine.
3 thoughts on “Artists Who Work”
tried to respond but do not remember password for your WordPress account Keith.
Alan Robert *Alan* Black, Ph.D., CSP, DLA,TM-Gold C,r,E,8,N,G! process – S.T.A.M.P.S. – S.P.R.E.A.D.
Alan & Creative Thinking – Google search
*Create **Your Life, Do not live one Created for You* *706 353 3387 firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.cre8ng.com *
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 10:55 AM, The Creativity Guru wrote:
> keithsawyer posted: “Do you imagine artists working alone, in a basement > somewhere, detached from society? Do you imagine them being poor, bad with > money, unable to function well in the everyday world of work? This image is > mostly false. Artists are embedded in the world, ju” >
Kudos to you for keeping a sharp eye on this topic. But alas, for every well-documented article like this one (and every sensible column you write), there is a CBS Good Morning segment emphasizing the delicate and addled nature of the creative that spotlights the major purveyor of the “mad genius” myth. She has personal reasons for doing so which have nothing whatever to do with science. But for too many folks it’s romantic and reassuring to believe that the exceptionally gifted must suffer for it, and hide from a world they cannot manage.
After three decades of watching this nonsense float around the field of psychology as well as the general media, and writing The Insanity Hoax to passionately (and factually!) debunk it , I have finally accepted the sad truth: that the notion of the “artist in a turret,” or the wild-eyed creatives only marginally in control of themselves, is far too appealing to the public to ever go away. Data be damned!
Thanks for another good one, Keith. I’ve printed out the NYT article for my files, anyway. 😉
Myths continue to exist for a reason–that’s something for psychologists and cultural anthropologists to explore.