jump to navigation

Creativity Increases Dishonesty January 2, 2013

Posted by keithsawyer in New research, Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , ,
trackback

A new study from Harvard and Duke Universities* suggests that more creative people are more dishonest. As the authors put it:

Across all of our studies, we consistently find that greater creativity promotes dishonesty by increasing individuals’ ability to justify their unethical actions (p. 447).

This really bothered me, because one of my life’s goals has been to help people become more creative. So I closely read the article. I conclude that it’s a well-done study and the results are worth taking seriously.

Let’s dive into the details of the six studies they conducted.

Pilot study. The authors circulated a questionnaire to 99 employees of an advertising agency. The questionnaire asked how likely they would be to engage in eight ethically questionable behaviors (e.g. “Take home office supplies from work” or “Inflate your business expense report”). Then the questionnaire asked which department they worked in, and to what extent their job required creativity. Top managers also rated the creativity required of each department. The correlation between creativity and self-reported likelihood to behave dishonestly was .20 and .24, which is statistically significant (although not a very high effect size).

Study 1. Because intelligence test scores and creativity test scores are correlated, the authors had to make sure that it isn’t just high intelligence that makes someone more likely to be dishonest. They enlisted 97 college undergraduates, and gave them three creativity assessments (Gough’s adjective checklist, Hocevar’s Creative Behavior Inventory, and Kirton’s cognitive style questionnaire).

Then, each person completed three tasks–a perception task, a problem-solving task, and a multiple-choice task. In each of these tasks, each correct answer resulted in a small payment to the participant. For all three tasks, the task was designed so that participants reported their own performance; participants believed that they could overstate their performance without detection (although the researchers had secretly designed a way to track these deceptions). So the monetary reward, combined with the (perceived) inability for anyone to detect cheating, tempted each person to lie to get a larger monetary reward.

The correlations between the creativity tests and the level of dishonesty were fairly high, ranging from .23 to .53.

There’s one suspicious finding in Study 1: the creativity measures and the intelligence measures they used were not correlated. And yet, we know from decades of research on creativity and intelligence that in fact, these are correlated (at something between .20 and .40). (See Explaining Creativity, pages 52-57).

Study 2. They found that if you stimulate a creative mindset, it increases the degree of dishonesty, compared to a control task where the creative mindset was not stimulated.

Study 3. Why are creative people more dishonest? The researchers hypothesized that creativity increases a person’s ability to justify their unethical actions to themselves. This study’s design is a bit complicated, but basically, they found that people who were stimulated with a creative mindset were just as dishonest regardless of how easy it is to justify their dishonesty, but the control group (not stimulated for creativity) only was dishonest when the task design made it easier to justify their dishonesty. This confirmed their hypothesis that creativity makes it easier to justify unethical actions.

Study 4. This used the same procedure as Study 3, but this time giving the three creativity assessments to everyone in advance (rather than stimulating a creative mindset in half of the participants). The findings were similar: People who scored higher on the creativity assessments were more likely to lie even when the task was designed to make it harder to justify their unethical behavior. This also confirmed the hypothesis that creativity increases one’s ability to justify unethical actions to themselves.

Study 5. This study essentially combined Studies 3 and 4, by assessing creativity and then trying to stimulate a more creative mindset. Here’s what happened: For those people who scored low on creativity, the creative mindset stimulation increased their degree of lying. For people who scored high in creativity, the creative mindset stimulation didn’t result in more lying. In other words, creative people are already equipped to justify their lying, but less creative people need a creative mindset stimulation to prepare them to justify their lying.

The authors conclude that

This article casts a shadow on the widespread view that creativity always leads to ‘good’.

I wonder, however, if these studies are evidence that creativity leads to “bad” behavior in the real world. After all, these were inconsequential laboratory tasks that had no potential to hurt anyone. The total reward you could get, even if you lied every single time, was never more than $20. So why not lie? And, as the researchers point out, they designed the tasks on purpose so that participants were tempted to cheat, and so that participants believed no one would ever be able to detect their cheating.

I worry that these findings can be over-interpreted. For example, on page 455, the authors hint that U.S. society’s recent increase in innovation was responsible not only for the Internet and the iPhone, but also for ” a series of accounting scandals and the collapse of several billion-dollar companies,” for “academic dishonesty” by students, and for “scientific cheating” by research scientists. Is societal dishonesty and unethical business behavior really an unavoidable side-effect of greater innovation? That seems to be too big of a leap.

But I think this conclusion is warranted:

Thanks to greater creativity, people have more and diverse reasons to justify their own unethical behavior.

What do you think about these findings? Do they have implications for real-world behavior? What about in your own life?

*Gino and Ariely. (2012). The dark side of creativity: Original thinkers can be more dishonest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 102, No. 3, 445-459.

About these ads

Comments»

1. Kathy Dee - January 2, 2013

I think that the context for the studies skews the design of the research. The advertising industry is, in my opinion, one of the most manipulative businesses. From imbedding subliminal messages to using photo techniques to “selling” leisure time and social status.

I think that stimulating the creative process is probably one of the most important skills we can teach…and depending on the context, balancing it with a study of what is ethical behavior.

In a random sampling of my colleagues and friends, not very many of them understood “conflict of interest.” That would be something to study.

Thanks for putting this out there.

2. Micheil Douglas - January 4, 2013

Without researching the study, it occurs to me that perhaps the link is more tenous than the apparent conclusions would suggest.

After all is it not possible that given the current societal climate, among those well off, perhaps this merely indicates the measure of distrust people have for society in general, as well a having a distinct impression of unfariness, which engenders a unquestioned feeling of justification.

In other words, maybe the finding is merely cultural.

Given that apparently intelligence and creativity are linked, perhaps people who are / feel they are more intelligent feel more entitled to swindle, in a society which obviously does not encourage equality or fairness, but instead seems to reward putting oneself first.

Maybe JFK famous speech “Think not of what your country can do for you, …” is more relevant than ever. And the study only goes to prove that point.

3. Around the horn: fiscal cliff edition | Createquity. - January 5, 2013

[...] creativity linked to dishonesty? Keith Sawyer analyzes a new study and finds that the answer may be [...]

4. David Burkus - January 6, 2013

Ariely goes into more depth about the rationale behind this study in his newest book, which centers around dishonesty.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 493 other followers

%d bloggers like this: